![]() First, I've been looking for an easier way to transfer some of my 12,000 LPs to my wife's iPod. I looked forward to the USB portion of the testing for a number of reasons. ![]() The Creek also exhibited more subtle gradations of low-level dynamic articulation and a more natural sense of bloom. ![]() The Destiny's more detailed midrange was more holographic and rich than that of either of the two other phono stages, with a much greater sense of purity in the highs. The Creek phono stage, however, was in an entirely different league. The Marantz's high frequencies were somewhat less refined than the NAD's, but I felt its dynamics were slightly better. The Marantz and the NAD resolved similar amounts of detail, but the former had a silkier midrange. I compared the NAD PP 3 with the phono stage included in the Marantz PM5003 integrated amplifier via the Creek Destiny's Aux input, as well as with the Destiny's MM phono board (a $500 option). But my wife wasn't home, and neither of the dogs was interested. Listening to either of these tunes, I found it hard to sit still—I itched to twitch, grab a partner, and dance around the room. Finally, with cranked-up rock tunes, the PP 3 exhibited a strong sense of coherence, pacing, and rhythmic consistency, whether reproducing such simple arrangements as Ten Years After's "Love Like a Man," from Greatest Hits (LP, London LC 50008), or more elaborate, densely packed tracks such as Genesis' "Dance on a Volcano," from A Trick of the Tail (LP, ATCO SD-36-129).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |